Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Bahadurgarh earthquake
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:28, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- 2012 Bahadurgarh earthquake (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's the usual thing that happens with earthquake articles. It happens, the USGS' earthquake monitoring program reports it, the press repeats it and says "no casualties or damage were reported;" think of it like this – earthquakes happen every day, whether we notice them or not. Even if we do notice them, as I said, there's no damage, and that's the case here. This article basically said "an earthquake occurred in XXX at XXX, and it was felt". WP:GNG. hf24 20:49, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Doesn't come close to meeting standards on notability. Mikenorton (talk) 06:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Looks like fad. BO; talk 11:27, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Secret of success 06:42, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not significant, no known effects. A 4.9 temblor is nothing. You might not even notice it if you are walking around. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 16:01, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.