Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina Karen Campbell
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:16, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Tina Karen Campbell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable per WP:BIO, WP:MUSICBIO, WP:AUTHOR and WP:CREATIVE. No significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Unsourced personal info suggests WP:Conflict of interest by creator. Proposed deletion contested by creator. Borkificator (talk) 14:15, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Borkificator (talk) 14:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Borkificator (talk) 14:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. —Borkificator (talk) 14:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A long way from significant independent coverage required for WP:BIO. We seem to have two passing mentions in reliable sources, some blogs, and some token appearances on television shows. The Crave on Music website might have a claim to notability, but that would only warrant an article on the website itself, not the owner. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 14:30, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails all applicable standards of notability--ThePaintedOne (talk) 17:53, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails to have significant coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 21:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I have never heard of this person, and besides I already see a consensus. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 07:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.